Let’s Talk About Old Content And Redirect Chains

Posted by

While browsing some concerns sent to SEJ after a current webinar, two of them stood out to me as related and comparable.

That implies you remain in for a reward, gentile reader, due to the fact that today’s an unique 2-for-1 version of Ask an SEO.

Here are the concerns:

Ines asked: What do you do with old websites that have numerous URLs with extremely little traffic to most of them. Do you remove the bad material initially? How much should I get rid of at a time? Exists a rule? Should I take internal links into account?

Christina asked: Is it better to redirect old content to brand-new material if that leads to a redirect chain? Or should I simply erase that material?

Let’s Discuss Old Content

There’s a lot to unpack here, so let’s dive into it.

I’ll get my family pet peeve out of the method first: Hopefully, you have dates on this old content, so that the readers who do stumble upon it understand that it’s old and outdated.

There are a number of approaches you can take here, and a great deal of it depends upon your keyword research and data.

The first concern I ‘d ask myself for any piece of content is: Is this beneficial? Or is it damaging (out of date, bad advice, no longer pertinent, etc)?

If it’s harmful or no longer appropriate, like a post on how to grow your Google+ following, you can simply go on and erase it. There’s nothing appropriate to redirect it to.

If it works, you’re entrusted a couple of alternatives:

  • Re-write it or integrate it with other content to see if you can get more traffic to it.
  • If you currently have actually more upgraded or more relevant material, go on and 301 reroute it to that content.
  • If it no longer uses to your website or organization, go ahead and delete it.

A lot of SEO pros will inform you that if it utilized to be an extremely popular piece with great deals of external links you need to 301 it to protect those links.

I’ll tell you to either figure out why it’s no longer super popular and upgrade it or keep it up for historical functions. It’s remarkable just how much of the “old” web no longer exists.

The secret here is to determine why the content isn’t popular.

As soon as you do that you can follow the below suggestions:

– Does it fix a user requirement but is simply poor quality? Re-write it.
– Is it no longer relevant/useful? Erase it.
– Exists newer or much better content somewhere else? Redirect it.
– Should I maintain it for historical reasons? Or is there simply little volume for that now, however I’m still getting traffic? Leave it alone.

OK, Now Let’s Speak about Redirects

Reroute chains get a lot of criticism in SEO.

There used to be a ton of argument about whether they pass PageRank, just how much PageRank they pass, how much decays, how many Google will follow, and so on.

For 99.9999925% of people, none of that matters.

If these are things we require to fret about, they’re so minimal that they don’t have much of an effect. The reality is Google will follow redirects and will pass some “value” through them.

There’s no unfavorable effect or charge from having redirect chains however aim for not more than five hops as Google might drop from following the redirects.

Sure, they aren’t ideal. They will include a few milliseconds of load time for your page, and they may not send out 100% of the PageRank worth through to the destination, however all that is very little and, honestly, over-thinking SEO.

When choosing if you should reroute or erase content, use the rubric above.

And as a best practice, if you have actually redirect chains, bring them to a minimal by updating redirects to point directly to the final destination.

For instance, if you have A-> B-> C (one redirect chain), produce A-> C and B-> C (two redirects) instead.

Hope this helps.

Have a concern about SEO? Send via this kind.

More resources: